Home
Information
Login
Register
Waiting lists
Membership
Hall of fame
Tournaments
Best game
Wikichess
Rating list
Problems
Forum
Links
Help
About
| Install FICGS apps | |
| play chess online |  |
|
Game result (poker) S. Legrand, 2218 Y. Aahlad, 2328 0-1 See game 136063 |
Hot news Discussions Files search Social network
Wikichess (open chess repertoire project) now contains 247130 articles.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Moves : Qf6 Nc6 ? Nf6 Qe7 ? (back)
Position after : Nxe5 , last edited by Gregory Kohut (1783) [2024 April 22] |
The beginning of the end ! Black has no moveoptions and the Qf6-Move is a MUST and not a can.
The following comment is by me (Benjamin Aldag):
The Kings Gambit was good to play in the early 80s. But with comming of good and fast computers, the Kings Gambit is researched move for move in all lines. If both players play the best moves, all white can reach is a draw. But the point is, white has the chance, to do more wrong in the opening, than black. Ok, there are some kiddy-tricks by white, but if black want an equal game, he will get it. Now letz take a look to the latvian,- the Kings Gambit with a tempo down. If the Kings Gambit is bad, why should the Latvian Gambit good for black with a tempo down ? The only way for black is to hope, that the white player isn't prepared for this gambit. There are many traps, but the basics of these traps are easy to see. Black is from beginning on under big pressure and has no dynamic play. In nearly all lines of the Latvian Gambit, black has only forced moves. From now on, i will give to all moves in all lines my commentary. Ok.... i'am not a GM, IM, or FM, but i think i know the Latvian Gambit really good.
============
Contributors : Benjamin Aldag, Gregory Kohut
[ECO "C40"] [Opening "Latvian counter-gambit"]
Qf6 : 191 games, White ELO av : 1821, Black ELO av : 1852
1-0 : 57.1% , 1/2-1/2 : 8.4% , 0-1 : 34.6%
Nf6 : 44 games, White ELO av : 1759, Black ELO av : 1710
1-0 : 52.3% , 1/2-1/2 : 9.1% , 0-1 : 38.6%
Nc6 : 6 games, White ELO av : 1994, Black ELO av : 1774
1-0 : 83.3% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 16.7%
Qe7 : 6 games, White ELO av : 1510, Black ELO av : 1679
1-0 : 50% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 50%
d6 : 2 games, White ELO av : 1188, Black ELO av : 1299
1-0 : 50% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 50%
Bc5 : 1 game, White ELO av : 1298, Black ELO av : 1770
1-0 : 100% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 0%
Bd6 : 1 game, White ELO av : 1581, Black ELO av : 1000
1-0 : 100% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 0%
g6 : 1 game, White ELO av : 2187, Black ELO av : 1277
1-0 : 100% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 0%
See this chess line with the javascript viewer
The following comment is by me (Benjamin Aldag):
The Kings Gambit was good to play in the early 80s. But with comming of good and fast computers, the Kings Gambit is researched move for move in all lines. If both players play the best moves, all white can reach is a draw. But the point is, white has the chance, to do more wrong in the opening, than black. Ok, there are some kiddy-tricks by white, but if black want an equal game, he will get it. Now letz take a look to the latvian,- the Kings Gambit with a tempo down. If the Kings Gambit is bad, why should the Latvian Gambit good for black with a tempo down ? The only way for black is to hope, that the white player isn't prepared for this gambit. There are many traps, but the basics of these traps are easy to see. Black is from beginning on under big pressure and has no dynamic play. In nearly all lines of the Latvian Gambit, black has only forced moves. From now on, i will give to all moves in all lines my commentary. Ok.... i'am not a GM, IM, or FM, but i think i know the Latvian Gambit really good.
============
Contributors : Benjamin Aldag, Gregory Kohut
[ECO "C40"] [Opening "Latvian counter-gambit"]
Qf6 : 191 games, White ELO av : 1821, Black ELO av : 1852
1-0 : 57.1% , 1/2-1/2 : 8.4% , 0-1 : 34.6%
Nf6 : 44 games, White ELO av : 1759, Black ELO av : 1710
1-0 : 52.3% , 1/2-1/2 : 9.1% , 0-1 : 38.6%
Nc6 : 6 games, White ELO av : 1994, Black ELO av : 1774
1-0 : 83.3% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 16.7%
Qe7 : 6 games, White ELO av : 1510, Black ELO av : 1679
1-0 : 50% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 50%
d6 : 2 games, White ELO av : 1188, Black ELO av : 1299
1-0 : 50% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 50%
Bc5 : 1 game, White ELO av : 1298, Black ELO av : 1770
1-0 : 100% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 0%
Bd6 : 1 game, White ELO av : 1581, Black ELO av : 1000
1-0 : 100% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 0%
g6 : 1 game, White ELO av : 2187, Black ELO av : 1277
1-0 : 100% , 1/2-1/2 : 0% , 0-1 : 0%
See this chess line with the javascript viewer
[Chess forum]
[Rating lists]
[Countries]
[Chess openings]
[Legal informations]
[Contact]
[Social network] [Hot news] [Discussions] [Seo forums] [Meet people] [Directory]
[Social network] [Hot news] [Discussions] [Seo forums] [Meet people] [Directory]
Social network : create your photo albums, discuss with your friends...
Hot news & buzz : discover the latest news and buzz on the internet...
Discussions : questions and answers, forums on almost everything...
Seo forums : search engines optimisation forums, web directory...
Play the strongest international correspondence chess players !
|
Marciz, Alexander (RUS) [member # 11810] Correspondence chess : 2501 FIM Ranked # 25 in the rating list. Rating history : No change this year. Advanced chess : 2332 Bestlogik - 2360. LSS - 2445  This member has no profile in the social network. |
| | Correspondence chess World championship Play chess games Go (weiqi, baduk) Advanced chess Play big chess Chess trainer apk Rated tournaments Poker texas hold'em Fischer random chess |  |